Read time: 6 minutes

Bale direct cost effective in the right circumstances

The Bale Direct system is an effective harvest weed seed control method that has also turned a quid for David Heinjus on his family’s mixed farm, Pareta Farms, near Freeling on the edge of the Barossa Valley, SA.

David Heinjus is well into a seven year campaign against herbicide resistant weeds using the Bale Direct technology.

David Heinjus is well into a seven year campaign against herbicide resistant weeds using the Bale Direct technology.

Herbicide resistant ryegrass has been a challenge on their 3500 ha farm for several years and wild radish is also showing signs of developing resistance. For around 20 years oaten hay production has been part of the rotation on the farms and this has helped manage the annual ryegrass problem.

In 2007 the family leased a farm at Kapunda and reintroduced livestock to their farming operation. They are currently running 2000 ewes for wool and prime lamb production and have included a vetch and balansa clover pasture phase to the rotation of bread and durum wheat, faba bean, canola and oaten hay.

Mr Heinjus invested in the Bale Direct system in 2009, when he saw the opportunity to reliably collect weed seed at harvest and produce a salable commodity in the process.

“Livestock and hay production helped contain the problem we had with annual ryegrass but we could see that it was not going to be the whole answer,” said Mr Heinjus. “We didn’t want to burn chaff rows or heaps because our farms are surrounded by many neighbours. The Bale Direct system is a great way to collect and remove weed seed from all our crops and we have been very pleased with the results.”

To operate efficiently the Bale Direct system requires a large harvester but once the adaption is made the baling operation does not slow harvesting down. Since having the unit installed Mr Heinjus has modified it slightly, adding a small water tank and pump to spray water into the baling chamber to help maximise bale weight in hot conditions.

The bales are sold to a livestock feed pellet mill less than 10 km from the Heinjus’ farms, making the sale of 8000 plus bales a year a profitable income stream for the business. Mr Heinjus identifies availability of markets and freight as the greatest barriers to the adoption of the Bale Direct technology.

He also employs some additional casual labour at harvest time to stack the bales but overall the system has provided a good return on investment. Mr Heinjus has a professional background in financial management and planning and so was in a good position to thoroughly test the profitability as well as the practical benefit of his investment in this harvest weed seed control method.

“We have the advantage of a nearby market and we take care of the delivery ourselves,” he said. “We also sell directly to some customers who use the straw for bedding in piggeries and chicken sheds. Once the straw has been used for bedding it is generally composted and that is the final step in destroying the weed seeds.”

To maximise profitability with the Bale Direct system Mr Heinjus has kept their harvester a few years longer than he would normally keep a new harvester. He plans to sell the harvester, complete with the Bale Direct module, in 2015–16 at the conclusion of a seven-year dedicated campaign to drive down the weed seed bank.

The Direct Bale system captures over 95 per cent of weed seeds present at harvest at a cost of just under $50/ha over 1000 ha.

The Direct Bale system captures over 95 per cent of weed seeds present at harvest at a cost of just under $50/ha over 1000 ha.

The only downside to the system in Mr Heinjus’ view is the continual removal of the crop residue from their paddocks. Now that the baling program has removed a significant amount of weed seed from the farms Mr Heinjus is planning to revert back to weed control methods that retain more crop residue in the paddocks.

He is confident that the hay production and livestock and pasture phase will be able to provide reliable control once the weed seed bank has been significantly run down during the seven year harvest weed seed control plan using the Bale Direct system.

“The pasture phase is a low risk break crop and weed control option for us,” he said. “We can sow vetch and balansa clover early and not be concerned about frost-prone paddocks. The high bulk pasture competes well with weeds and the sheep clean up any rogues that do appear.”

Mr Heinjus uses the ewes and lambs in a controlled grazing program to take advantage of the high bulk of feed. At weaning the ewes are removed, leaving the lambs to finish on the pasture and to clean up any weeds before they set seed.

“In addition to the weed control advantages, the pasture also provides additional soil nitrogen and is a disease break for the cereal crops,” he said. “Once the Bale Direct phase is complete we will reintroduce stubble grazing to clean up cropping paddocks after harvest.”

After some initial testing to establish that herbicide resistant weeds were present on the farms, Mr Heinjus now treats all weeds as if they were resistant and has built as much diversity as possible into his weed management plan.

“There are weeds resistant to group A and B herbicides and I expect there would be some glyphosate resistant weeds too,” he said. “We have found that we are still using similar amounts of herbicide but the sprays are more effective than they were before we started our campaign to bring crop weeds under control.”

The large bales produced have many uses in intensive agriculture, construction and energy industries, making the system economically attractive when the farm has buyers nearby.

The large bales produced have many uses in intensive agriculture, construction and energy industries, making the system economically attractive when the farm has buyers nearby.

Costing it out

Wongan Hills grower, Graham Shields, developed the Glenvar Bale Direct system, which captures all of the residue leaving the harvester, including 95 to 98 per cent of weed seeds.

Peter Newman from the AHRI communications team, said the end uses for the bales include stockfeed pellets, animal bedding, ethanol fuel and straw logs for power generation or the manufacture of strawboard.

“Overall the Bale Direct system is a great way to remove weed seeds at harvest while increasing profitability,” he said.

“However, this is a costly option if you don’t have a suitable market for the bales nearby because the system has high finance, fuel, maintenance, bale handling and residue removal costs.”

The estimated cost, based on one harvester and including nutrient removal costs for a 2 t/ha wheat crop, is $49.38 per hectare for 1000 ha, down to $32.47 per ha for 4000 ha. With access to a suitable market these costs can easily be recovered through the additional income, as David Heinjus has found.

Research supported by AHRI and the Grains Research and Development Corporation (GRDC) shows seedbanks of annual weeds can be rapidly depleted when harvest weed seed control systems are used to capture and destroy weed seeds at harvest.

Related Articles

View all

WeedSmart agronomist set to tackle high rainfall zone weeds

Every locality has its own spectrum of weeds, and growers face different opportunities and challenges regarding the control tactics they can employ. The WeedSmart Big 6 approach is a practical way to ensure that an integrated weed management program is put in place that disrupts weed seed production and the evolution of herbicide resistance. Commencing in January 2021, Jana Dixon has joined the WeedSmart team of extension agronomists, with a focus on applying the Big 6 to manage weeds in the high rainfall cropping systems of southern Australia – from Esperance in WA to south-eastern SA, Tasmania and south-western Victoria. Jana will add to the dedicated and experienced extension agronomists on the WeedSmart team with Peter Newman in the Western region, Chris Davey in the South, Greg and Kirrily Condon in the East and Paul McIntosh in the North. Jana Dixon has joined the WeedSmart team of extension agronomists, with a focus on applying the Big 6 to manage weeds in the high rainfall cropping systems of southern Australia – from Esperance in WA to south-eastern SA, Tasmania and south-western Victoria. Jana hails from the Mid North of SA, and began working at Pinion Advisory (previously Rural Directions) while she was studying agriculture at the University of Adelaide. She has been employed full-time at Pinion Advisory since January 2019 as an agribusiness consultant, based in Clare, and spends most of her time delivering agronomy and farm business advice to clients from a wide range of cropping regions in South Australia. Pinion Advisory is a foundation WeedSmart sponsor and Jana has been involved in two WeedSmart Week events already – the first as a participant and grower group organiser at the Horsham event in 2019 and then as the local organiser for WeedSmart Week 2020 in Clare. In welcoming her to the WeedSmart team, program manager Lisa Mayer says Jana brings energy, commitment and insight to deliver communications focussed on the southern region’s high rainfall regions. “Growers in the southern high rainfall zones are facing some serious issues with herbicide resistance influencing their farming decisions,” says Ms Mayer. “Jana will be engaging with agronomists, growers and researchers in each of the distinct high rainfall zones to understand the complexities and look for practical ways to apply the WeedSmart Big 6 in various cropping scenarios.” “We plan to deliver WeedSmart Week in Esperance, part of Western Australia’s high rainfall cropping zone, in August 2021 and Jana will play a key role in the planning and delivering of our annual 3-day flagship event.” Jana says her experience with the WeedSmart program has been very positive and she has been particularly impressed with the support the program has from all sectors of the grains industry. Newly appointed WeedSmart extension agronomist, Jana Dixon (green cap) leading discussions with farm visit host, Ben Marshman, Owen SA, and growers and agronomists attending WeedSmart Week 2020 in Clare. “I have spoken to many growers and agronomists who have found real value in the information that the WeedSmart program delivers,” she says. “For many it is as much about considering another operator’s philosophy on dealing with weeds, and taking a fresh look at their own systems, rather than just learning about a new tactic or the traits of a new herbicide in isolation from the big picture.” She says the high calibre of industry people who contribute their time and expertise to the program is testament to the value WeedSmart has to agribusiness, growers, agronomists and researchers alike. In taking on the responsibility for delivering information tailored for the high rainfall zones Jana says she is pleased to have an extensive network of contacts through Pinion Advisory, with offices in a number of high rainfall areas to provide easy access to local agronomists and growers. She is also aware that there are major differences in weed spectrums and farming systems in each high rainfall zone and plans to take full advantage of the opportunity this role presents to expand her understanding of different approaches to weed management. “The long and favourable growing season and the associated prolonged periods of weed germination, is a key factor that I see potentially impacting on a grower’s weed management strategies in these regions,” she says. “On the other hand, access to highly diverse rotations and a focus on crop competition are two strategies that can play an important role in achieving excellent weed management in these regions.” “I am keen to engage with anyone working and farming in the high rainfall zones to build my knowledge and understanding,” she says. “And to create opportunities to develop and extend the WeedSmart Big 6 strategies, both herbicide and non-herbicide, that work in each area and in different situations.” WeedSmart is the industry voice delivering science-backed weed control solutions with support from the Grains Research and Development Corporation (GRDC), major herbicide, machinery and seed companies, and university and government research partners, all of whom have a stake in sustainable farming systems. You an follow Jana on Twitter and keep up to date with the HRZ here.

Never cut the herbicide application rate

Scientific studies have demonstrated that resistance can rapidly evolve in weeds subjected to low doses of herbicide. Some weeds can develop resistance within a few generations. Full rates when mixing herbicides too! When mixing herbicides it is important that each product is still applied at the full label rate to ensure high mortality. Applying different chemicals in one mix can provide an additive advantage. It is important to understand the mode of action of each herbicide on the plant when preparing a herbicide mix. This is just as important for pre-emergent grass weed mixes as it is for post-emergent mixes aimed at broadleaf weed control. ALWAYS READ THE LABEL. Surrounding weed seeds with a combination of pre-emergent herbicides with different modes of action can give a high level of control and help extend the useful life of all the chemicals used. The high level of control must be supported with additional control measures for all survivors. All products with different modes of action must be applied at full label rates for this to be an effective strategy.   Mixing two chemicals with the same mode of action can achieve some additional efficacy, however, the mix should deliver the combined full rate to ensure a lethal dose. The amount of stubble present and crop safety are all important considerations when mixing chemicals. For example, when using a tank mix of Avadex® and trifluralin to control ryegrass in wheat, the rates used will vary depending on the sowing system and level of stubble retention. Be sure to get good advice. Many herbicides on the market are a combination of two or more modes of action within the one product. These products must be applied at the full label rate to be effective. Having dual action does not negate the need to change herbicide products and rotate modes of action. Repeated use of any single strategy will reduce the effectiveness of that strategy over time.  

Spray well – correct nozzles, adjuvants and water rates

Spray application is a technical field and growers need to make sure their equipment and application techniques are spot-on. The GRDC Spray Application GrowNote provides detailed information and about 80 videos to demonstrate key skills. Prevent spray-drift The focus of spraying herbicide needs to be on doing the job right so the weeds receive the correct dose and die, and this includes reducing the air borne fraction to a bare minimum. Bill Gordon’s 10 Tips for Reducing Spray Drift Choose all products in the tank mix carefully. Understand the product mode of action and coverage requirements. Select (and check) the coarsest spray quality that will provide effective control. Expect that surface temperature inversions will form as sunset approaches and will likely persist overnight and even beyond sunrise on many occasions. DO NOT SPRAY. Use weather forecasts to inform your spray decisions. Only start spraying when the sun is about 20 degrees above the horizon and when the wind speed has been above 4–5 km/hr for more than 20–30 minutes, and clearly blowing away from any adjacent sensitive crops or areas. Set the boom height to achieve a double overlap of the spray patterns. Avoid higher spraying speeds. Leave buffers unsprayed if necessary and come back. Continue to monitor conditions, particularly wind speed, at the site during the spray operation High water rates don’t have to slow you down Some growers are concerned that increasing the water rate when applying herbicide will slow down their spray operation and cost them money. However, the biggest financial loss during spraying usually comes from a failed spray job. To keep your spray operation as time efficient as possible when using more effective and reliable application volumes, you can: Use nurse tanks around the farm to reduce the time spent travelling back to a central re-fill point. Use a larger pump, e.g. 2.5 inch, to make re-filling quicker. Pre-mix the batch while the sprayer is operating. Many mixes can be held in the mixing tank for up to 6 hours. However, wettable granules and suspension concentrates will need agitation to keep them in solution. For pre-emergent herbicides in high stubble situations, carrier volume has a large effect on the level of control achieved. Across four trial sites Dr Borger’s research demonstrated that ryegrass control with trifluralin or Sakura® increased from 53% control when the carrier volume was 30 L/ha to 78% control when the carrier volume was increased to 150 L water/ha in high Water quality and mixing order Water quality is often overlooked as a possible contributor to herbicide failure and can lead to confusion over the herbicide resistance status of weeds on a property. Water should be considered as one of the chemicals in any mix, given that water quality varies markedly depending on its source. Getting the mixing order right is essential for effective spray results. Don’t start mixing until the water quality is right Podcast – Mixing herbicides Adjuvants Sometimes adding an adjuvant is beneficial and sometimes it is detrimental; and there is an art to knowing how to best deploy these additives. When weeds are susceptible to the applied herbicides, the effectiveness of adjuvants generally goes un-noticed. Correctly applied adjuvants can reduce the impact of low level herbicide resistance by helping to maximise the amount of herbicide taken up by the plant.

Subscribe to the WeedSmart Newsletter