Read time: 3 minutes

Eradicating barnyard grass in dryland cotton systems

The adoption of the ‘2+2’ fallow management strategy has proven to be very effective in driving down seed bank numbers in dryland Roundup Ready Flex® cotton systems.

GR Awnless barnyardgrass

The risk of glyphosate resistance in weeds is widely understood and growers are actively minimising the risk through adherence to Crop Management Plans that include the ‘2+2’ strategy of using at least two non-glyphosate tactics in-crop and two non-glyphosate treatments in the fallow.

Queensland Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry (DAFF) senior research scientist, Dr Jeff Werth, said barnyard grass was a serious concern in cotton systems because it is known to be prone to glyphosate resistance and renowned as a ‘hard to kill’ weed.

Dr Werth said that while the tactics currently recommended as best practice are very effective there are still questions surrounding the best course of action if individual plants or small patches of weeds were to survive a glyphosate treatment.

Dr Werth believes all survivors should be treated as if they were glyphosate-resistant and that growers can aim to eradicate weeds like barnyard grass.

“The aim is to prevent seed set of all weeds but particularly those that appear to have survived a glyphosate spray,” said Dr Werth.

“If single survivors become a patch of survivors it is important to intensively manage the patch and achieve eradication,” he said. “Research has indicated that fallow management holds the key to effective management of resistant weeds.”

Patch trial - Hermitage

In a long term systems experiment at Hermitage Research Station near Warwick, Dr Werth and his team are studying the efficacy of the ‘2+2’ fallow treatment recommendation and the value of additional eradication tactics in crop and in the fallow on glyphosate resistant barnyard grass.

The additional in-crop eradication tactics being tested in the trial are pre-plant application of metolachlor, double-knock using a shielded sprayer and chipping (table below). In the fallow, chipping of survivors was the only eradication tactic applied due to a dry fallow period.

Non-glyphosate control tactics used in the patch eradication trial. Best management practice is the 2+2 treatment. Four in-crop glyphosate applications were used in Year 1 (cotton) and two in Year 2 (fallow).

Phase 2+2 best management practice treatment (BMP) Additional eradication tactics (Erad)
Year 1 – Roundup Flex Cotton
Early season Paraquat + Pendimethalin applied at planting Pre-plant metolachlor applied approx 6 wks prior to planting
Mid-season Diuron applied as layby Shielded paraquat applied with Diuron
Late season No action Hand hoeing
Year 2 – Fallow
Early season Metolachlor applied prior to expected peak emergence Paraquat applied as double knock
Mid-season No action Chip of survivors
Late season Paraquat applied as double knock Hand hoeing

Dr Werth said the recommended double knock treatment for barnyard grass plants that have survived glyphosate applications in the fallow is haloxyfop (Group A e.g. Verdict) followed by paraquat (Group L). As paraquat is not a registered option in-crop, monitoring and control of survivors from Group A applications will be essential to prevent Group A resistance.

The study showed a significant reduction in total emergences of barnyard grass achieved when the 2+2 treatment is applied to reduce the reliance on glyphosate.

“As the experiment continues we expect the eradication tactics to become increasingly important once the seed bank levels have been significantly reduced,” said Dr Werth.

Ian Taylor, Cotton Research and Development Corporation (CRDC)General Manager R&D Investment, said dryland cotton growers also have options to use herbicides other than glyphosate throughout the grain crop rotation and may also consider using strategic tillage early in fallow periods where there was a good chance of replenishing rain.

“The Cotton Pest Management Guide has been recently updated and is essential reading for growers,” he said. “The best management practices currently recommended are proven to be effective and their implementation on all cotton fields will protect the long-term efficacy of glyphosate for the industry.”

CRDC and Monsanto Australia are funding this study into survivor management.

Related Articles

View all

Never cut the herbicide application rate

Scientific studies have demonstrated that resistance can rapidly evolve in weeds subjected to low doses of herbicide. Some weeds can develop resistance within a few generations. Full rates when mixing herbicides too! When mixing herbicides it is important that each product is still applied at the full label rate to ensure high mortality. Applying different chemicals in one mix can provide an additive advantage. It is important to understand the mode of action of each herbicide on the plant when preparing a herbicide mix. This is just as important for pre-emergent grass weed mixes as it is for post-emergent mixes aimed at broadleaf weed control. ALWAYS READ THE LABEL. Surrounding weed seeds with a combination of pre-emergent herbicides with different modes of action can give a high level of control and help extend the useful life of all the chemicals used. The high level of control must be supported with additional control measures for all survivors. All products with different modes of action must be applied at full label rates for this to be an effective strategy.   Mixing two chemicals with the same mode of action can achieve some additional efficacy, however, the mix should deliver the combined full rate to ensure a lethal dose. The amount of stubble present and crop safety are all important considerations when mixing chemicals. For example, when using a tank mix of Avadex® and trifluralin to control ryegrass in wheat, the rates used will vary depending on the sowing system and level of stubble retention. Be sure to get good advice. Many herbicides on the market are a combination of two or more modes of action within the one product. These products must be applied at the full label rate to be effective. Having dual action does not negate the need to change herbicide products and rotate modes of action. Repeated use of any single strategy will reduce the effectiveness of that strategy over time.  

Spray well – correct nozzles, adjuvants and water rates

Spray application is a technical field and growers need to make sure their equipment and application techniques are spot-on. The GRDC Spray Application GrowNote provides detailed information and about 80 videos to demonstrate key skills. Prevent spray-drift The focus of spraying herbicide needs to be on doing the job right so the weeds receive the correct dose and die, and this includes reducing the air borne fraction to a bare minimum. Bill Gordon’s 10 Tips for Reducing Spray Drift Choose all products in the tank mix carefully. Understand the product mode of action and coverage requirements. Select (and check) the coarsest spray quality that will provide effective control. Expect that surface temperature inversions will form as sunset approaches and will likely persist overnight and even beyond sunrise on many occasions. DO NOT SPRAY. Use weather forecasts to inform your spray decisions. Only start spraying when the sun is about 20 degrees above the horizon and when the wind speed has been above 4–5 km/hr for more than 20–30 minutes, and clearly blowing away from any adjacent sensitive crops or areas. Set the boom height to achieve a double overlap of the spray patterns. Avoid higher spraying speeds. Leave buffers unsprayed if necessary and come back. Continue to monitor conditions, particularly wind speed, at the site during the spray operation High water rates don’t have to slow you down Some growers are concerned that increasing the water rate when applying herbicide will slow down their spray operation and cost them money. However, the biggest financial loss during spraying usually comes from a failed spray job. To keep your spray operation as time efficient as possible when using more effective and reliable application volumes, you can: Use nurse tanks around the farm to reduce the time spent travelling back to a central re-fill point. Use a larger pump, e.g. 2.5 inch, to make re-filling quicker. Pre-mix the batch while the sprayer is operating. Many mixes can be held in the mixing tank for up to 6 hours. However, wettable granules and suspension concentrates will need agitation to keep them in solution. For pre-emergent herbicides in high stubble situations, carrier volume has a large effect on the level of control achieved. Across four trial sites Dr Borger’s research demonstrated that ryegrass control with trifluralin or Sakura® increased from 53% control when the carrier volume was 30 L/ha to 78% control when the carrier volume was increased to 150 L water/ha in high Water quality and mixing order Water quality is often overlooked as a possible contributor to herbicide failure and can lead to confusion over the herbicide resistance status of weeds on a property. Water should be considered as one of the chemicals in any mix, given that water quality varies markedly depending on its source. Getting the mixing order right is essential for effective spray results. Don’t start mixing until the water quality is right Podcast – Mixing herbicides Adjuvants Sometimes adding an adjuvant is beneficial and sometimes it is detrimental; and there is an art to knowing how to best deploy these additives. When weeds are susceptible to the applied herbicides, the effectiveness of adjuvants generally goes un-noticed. Correctly applied adjuvants can reduce the impact of low level herbicide resistance by helping to maximise the amount of herbicide taken up by the plant.

Clean borders – avoid evolving resistance on the fence line

About one-quarter of glyphosate-resistant populations within broadacre cropping situations across Australia come from fencelines and other non-cropping areas of the farm. Along paddock borders, where there is no crop competition, weeds can flourish and, if not controlled, set lots of seed. The traditional approach has been to treat these weeds with glyphosate to keep borders clean but after 20-odd years this option is now failing and paddock borders are becoming a significant source of glyphosate-resistant weed seed. Weed researcher Eric Koetz said the limited options for managing weeds along irrigation infrastructure and other non-crop areas is a problem and is putting additional pressure on knock-down herbicides in irrigated systems. In some situations, cultivation can be used to kill the weeds and provide a firebreak, but on light soils this may pose an erosion risk and mowing or slashing may be safer options. Another possible tactic is to continue using herbicides but to ensure that a clean-up operation is carried out before any survivors can set seed. Some growers are choosing to increase the heat on weeds along the borders by planting the crop right to the fence and then baling the outside lap and spraying with a knockdown herbicide to kill any weeds and provide a firebreak. Another good option in some situations is to maintain a healthy border of vegetation using non-invasive grasses. In Queensland, buffel grass is a good example of a grass that can outcompete other weeds while not invading crop lands. If only herbicides are used on fencelines, resistance is inevitable. Surviving weeds on fencelines have no competition and access to plenty of soil moisture, so they set a lot of seed and resistance can easily flow into neighbouring paddocks. Other resources It’s time for a glyphosate intervention Farm hygiene cottons on – Cleave Rogan, St George What’s new in management of herbicide resistant weeds on fencelines? Keeping the farm clean – Graham Clapham, Norwin Don’t jeopardise glyphosate for clean fencelines Keeping fencelines clean Resistance risk to knock-down herbicides on irrigated cotton farms

Subscribe to the WeedSmart Newsletter