Read time: 2 minutes

Soil residual herbicides have come full circle in the north

Thursday, 22nd May

Renewed interest in using soil residual herbicides to control fallow weeds in the northern grains region is supported with research and development programs.

NSW DPI extension officer and weeds technical specialist, Tony Cook, said using soil residual chemistry following weed seed set prevention tactics has many advantages.

Mr Cook said there is active research and commercial interest in registering more soil residual products to reduce the number of weeds germinating during the fallow.

“The main advantage is that there is a broad range of soil residual modes of action that allows more effective herbicide rotation,” he said.

“There is a significant level of resistance with post-emergent chemistry, making it more important to try other modes of action before these chemicals lose their potency.”

There are seven commonly used mode of action groups with soil residual herbicide activity currently available. These groups are B, C, D, H, I, J and K and within these groups there are products that target different and essential weed biological processes, effectively increasing the options for herbicide rotation.

“An over-reliance on post-emergent and knock-down herbicides for fallow weed control has put these effective products under great pressure,” said Mr Cook.

“A new strategy is to use glyphosate or paraquat as a knock-down soon after harvest, followed by a soil residual spray.

“This can control several weed germinations and reduce the need for glyphosate sprays during the fallow,” he said.

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERAUpper Horton grain grower, Chris Bowman (left), and NSW DPI weeds technical specialist, Tony Cook, inspect a clean crop of barley. Mr Bowman has implemented many integrated weed management principles on his farm, including grazing, crop competition, strategic tillage and effective use of soil residual and post-emergence herbicides.

While the opportunities certainly exist and a growing bank of trial data is supporting the use of soil residual herbicides as part of an integrated weed control program, Mr Cook emphasises that expectations must be realistic and more experience with soil residual chemistry is required in the northern growing region.

“There can be no skimping or short cuts and these products come with some important management considerations that must be addressed for them to be effective,” he said.

“Incorporation in the soil, uniform application, timely rainfall and stubble management all need to be right for these products to reliably control weeds,” said Mr Cook.

“This is not a ‘set and forget’ option and risks such as residual chemical affecting the following crop must be taken into account.”

Mr Cook recognises that 100 per cent control with soil residual herbicides is rare.

“Under certain field conditions these products can breakdown faster than expected and a flush of weeds might germinate late in the fallow, or the effectiveness may be patchy across a paddock.

“A follow-up with a post-emergent herbicide is usually required,” he said. “Using a detector sprayer to apply the post-emergent product will significantly reduce costs and the amount of post-emergent applied to achieve 100 per cent control and thereby help preserve the pre-emergent chemistry.”

Each product has a plant-back period on the label that must be observed and if the fallow period has been dry it may be necessary to test for residual herbicide levels before planting sensitive crops.

Mr Cook said that organic matter, soil clay content, temperature and rainfall all impact on the breakdown of the chemical in the soil.

“One way to check for residual chemical is to hand-sow indicator plants, such as conventional canola (to test for Group B residues), at different sites across the paddock and to water them in,” he said.

“Do this two to four weeks before the planned sowing date and monitor the indicator plants to see if they germinate normally.”

Other indicator plants are used to test for residues of other MOA groups.

Related Articles

View all

Never cut the herbicide application rate

Scientific studies have demonstrated that resistance can rapidly evolve in weeds subjected to low doses of herbicide. Some weeds can develop resistance within a few generations. Full rates when mixing herbicides too! When mixing herbicides it is important that each product is still applied at the full label rate to ensure high mortality. Applying different chemicals in one mix can provide an additive advantage. It is important to understand the mode of action of each herbicide on the plant when preparing a herbicide mix. This is just as important for pre-emergent grass weed mixes as it is for post-emergent mixes aimed at broadleaf weed control. ALWAYS READ THE LABEL. Surrounding weed seeds with a combination of pre-emergent herbicides with different modes of action can give a high level of control and help extend the useful life of all the chemicals used. The high level of control must be supported with additional control measures for all survivors. All products with different modes of action must be applied at full label rates for this to be an effective strategy.   Mixing two chemicals with the same mode of action can achieve some additional efficacy, however, the mix should deliver the combined full rate to ensure a lethal dose. The amount of stubble present and crop safety are all important considerations when mixing chemicals. For example, when using a tank mix of Avadex® and trifluralin to control ryegrass in wheat, the rates used will vary depending on the sowing system and level of stubble retention. Be sure to get good advice. Many herbicides on the market are a combination of two or more modes of action within the one product. These products must be applied at the full label rate to be effective. Having dual action does not negate the need to change herbicide products and rotate modes of action. Repeated use of any single strategy will reduce the effectiveness of that strategy over time.  

Spray well – correct nozzles, adjuvants and water rates

Spray application is a technical field and growers need to make sure their equipment and application techniques are spot-on. The GRDC Spray Application GrowNote provides detailed information and about 80 videos to demonstrate key skills. Prevent spray-drift The focus of spraying herbicide needs to be on doing the job right so the weeds receive the correct dose and die, and this includes reducing the air borne fraction to a bare minimum. Bill Gordon’s 10 Tips for Reducing Spray Drift Choose all products in the tank mix carefully. Understand the product mode of action and coverage requirements. Select (and check) the coarsest spray quality that will provide effective control. Expect that surface temperature inversions will form as sunset approaches and will likely persist overnight and even beyond sunrise on many occasions. DO NOT SPRAY. Use weather forecasts to inform your spray decisions. Only start spraying when the sun is about 20 degrees above the horizon and when the wind speed has been above 4–5 km/hr for more than 20–30 minutes, and clearly blowing away from any adjacent sensitive crops or areas. Set the boom height to achieve a double overlap of the spray patterns. Avoid higher spraying speeds. Leave buffers unsprayed if necessary and come back. Continue to monitor conditions, particularly wind speed, at the site during the spray operation High water rates don’t have to slow you down Some growers are concerned that increasing the water rate when applying herbicide will slow down their spray operation and cost them money. However, the biggest financial loss during spraying usually comes from a failed spray job. To keep your spray operation as time efficient as possible when using more effective and reliable application volumes, you can: Use nurse tanks around the farm to reduce the time spent travelling back to a central re-fill point. Use a larger pump, e.g. 2.5 inch, to make re-filling quicker. Pre-mix the batch while the sprayer is operating. Many mixes can be held in the mixing tank for up to 6 hours. However, wettable granules and suspension concentrates will need agitation to keep them in solution. For pre-emergent herbicides in high stubble situations, carrier volume has a large effect on the level of control achieved. Across four trial sites Dr Borger’s research demonstrated that ryegrass control with trifluralin or Sakura® increased from 53% control when the carrier volume was 30 L/ha to 78% control when the carrier volume was increased to 150 L water/ha in high Water quality and mixing order Water quality is often overlooked as a possible contributor to herbicide failure and can lead to confusion over the herbicide resistance status of weeds on a property. Water should be considered as one of the chemicals in any mix, given that water quality varies markedly depending on its source. Getting the mixing order right is essential for effective spray results. Don’t start mixing until the water quality is right Podcast – Mixing herbicides Adjuvants Sometimes adding an adjuvant is beneficial and sometimes it is detrimental; and there is an art to knowing how to best deploy these additives. When weeds are susceptible to the applied herbicides, the effectiveness of adjuvants generally goes un-noticed. Correctly applied adjuvants can reduce the impact of low level herbicide resistance by helping to maximise the amount of herbicide taken up by the plant.

Clean borders – avoid evolving resistance on the fence line

About one-quarter of glyphosate-resistant populations within broadacre cropping situations across Australia come from fencelines and other non-cropping areas of the farm. Along paddock borders, where there is no crop competition, weeds can flourish and, if not controlled, set lots of seed. The traditional approach has been to treat these weeds with glyphosate to keep borders clean but after 20-odd years this option is now failing and paddock borders are becoming a significant source of glyphosate-resistant weed seed. Weed researcher Eric Koetz said the limited options for managing weeds along irrigation infrastructure and other non-crop areas is a problem and is putting additional pressure on knock-down herbicides in irrigated systems. In some situations, cultivation can be used to kill the weeds and provide a firebreak, but on light soils this may pose an erosion risk and mowing or slashing may be safer options. Another possible tactic is to continue using herbicides but to ensure that a clean-up operation is carried out before any survivors can set seed. Some growers are choosing to increase the heat on weeds along the borders by planting the crop right to the fence and then baling the outside lap and spraying with a knockdown herbicide to kill any weeds and provide a firebreak. Another good option in some situations is to maintain a healthy border of vegetation using non-invasive grasses. In Queensland, buffel grass is a good example of a grass that can outcompete other weeds while not invading crop lands. If only herbicides are used on fencelines, resistance is inevitable. Surviving weeds on fencelines have no competition and access to plenty of soil moisture, so they set a lot of seed and resistance can easily flow into neighbouring paddocks. Other resources It’s time for a glyphosate intervention Farm hygiene cottons on – Cleave Rogan, St George What’s new in management of herbicide resistant weeds on fencelines? Keeping the farm clean – Graham Clapham, Norwin Don’t jeopardise glyphosate for clean fencelines Keeping fencelines clean Resistance risk to knock-down herbicides on irrigated cotton farms

Subscribe to the WeedSmart Newsletter